It is a problem, whether or not you like it, because people do use antivirus programs, even ones you think are backwards, and if the game executable gets flagged as a virus, that is a big problem.bjg wrote:ShadowDragon8685 wrote:Massive problem right now: Norton Antivirus
Antivirus issues
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:46 am
Antivirus issues
Re: Report - Current Bugs and Issues
I do use antiviruses, real once. Have seen (and even more heard of) some false-positives. The most "famous" case I've heard of recently was Mcafee deleting some Windows system file and making systems unbootable. The most recent one in my practice was F-Prot "detecting" a virus in almost every Thunderbird mail file - resolved by opening a "ticket" with the F-Prot's support.ShadowDragon8685 wrote:It is a problem, whether or not you like it, because people do use antivirus programs, even ones you think are backwards, and if the game executable gets flagged as a virus, that is a big problem.bjg wrote:ShadowDragon8685 wrote:Massive problem right now: Norton Antivirus
Open a "ticket" with Symantec and/or check the file with some alternative tools (there is a chance the file is really getting infected on your machine or "on the way").
If you open a separate topic I'll tell why in my opinion the Norton Antivirus doesn't improve the security.
- sven
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:24 pm
- Location: British Columbia, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Antivirus issues
I've gotten in touch with Norton's tech support, and apparently, the thing to do when this happens is to fill out this form here.ShadowDragon8685 wrote:Massive problem right now: Norton Antivirus is detecting sis.exe as a virus and removing it. It's classifying sis.exe as a Heur.AdvML.B Heuristic Virus.
I've gone ahead and put in a ticket for us, though I had to enter 'I don't know' on some of the questions. I suspect it wouldn't hurt for anyone experiencing this issue to fill out that same form -- the support guy said it would probably take them at least 2 weeks to get to the issue, but I'd bet they prioritize things based on the number of reports they get.
Re: Antivirus issues
Here is why you'd better stay away from the Norton Antivirus:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/ ... point.html
These particular vulnerabilities are probably fixed, but the product family is broken by design. They don't sandbox untrusted data processing, so every buffer overflow is happening in a process running with higher possible permissions - this is a disaster waiting to happen.
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/ ... point.html
These particular vulnerabilities are probably fixed, but the product family is broken by design. They don't sandbox untrusted data processing, so every buffer overflow is happening in a process running with higher possible permissions - this is a disaster waiting to happen.
- sven
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:24 pm
- Location: British Columbia, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Antivirus issues
Ok, Symantec say's they're putting the current version of sis.exe on their 'whitelist'. Is sis64.exe also triggering a false positive for you? If so, we should submit it as well.sven wrote:I've gotten in touch with Norton's tech support, and apparently, the thing to do when this happens is to fill out this form here.ShadowDragon8685 wrote:Massive problem right now: Norton Antivirus is detecting sis.exe as a virus and removing it. It's classifying sis.exe as a Heur.AdvML.B Heuristic Virus.
Re: Antivirus issues
The idea that an antivirus program should operate based on a manually-updated whitelist seems absurd to me.
Re: Antivirus issues
Specially if you are the one who needs to manually update it.Arioch wrote:The idea that an antivirus program should operate based on a manually-updated whitelist seems absurd to me.

- sven
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:24 pm
- Location: British Columbia, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Antivirus issues
If this continues to be an issue, I will need to re-submit sis.exe and sis64.exe to Symantec every time we roll out a version of the binary via Steam. That's not actually undoable, contrary to what their support guy said, Symantec appears to have about a 1-business day turnaround time for whitelist submissions, and that's usually going to be sufficient to get a new binary on the list before it gets rolled out.bjg wrote:Specially if you are the one who needs to manually update it.Arioch wrote:The idea that an antivirus program should operate based on a manually-updated whitelist seems absurd to me.
But yes, it would be, at best, annoying. That said, if anyone using Norton/Symantec experiences more false positives, they should post about them here (or let me know via some other channel), and I'll start spamming that webform with SiS exes.