today and on last test run
Arioch wrote:The update server is in some state of deadness. Sven is looking at it.
bjg wrote:It should be easy for the updater to "remember" which program called it, and if it was sis64 - start it instead of sis. Is there a reason not to implement it?
Arioch wrote:bjg wrote:It should be easy for the updater to "remember" which program called it, and if it was sis64 - start it instead of sis. Is there a reason not to implement it?
It's a tool that only used by us, the developers and testers. It's slightly irritating to me as well, but it's really not any significant effort to click on a shortcut instead of the "play" button; I'd prefer that Sven not waste any time on it.
bjg wrote:The current is still can't be ran on (my) XP. I understand that this is the toll for testers only, but you officially support XP, and the older versions of the update.exe do run on it (so it's not something crucial).
sven wrote:I just did a little fiddling with the build for update.exe; I think it may now once again be XP compatible (but I don't have a test machine of my own around to test it atm.) If you re-download your installer using your download link, you should get a copy of the Feb 15th build. If you have a moment, I'd be curious to know whether or not it's working.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 113 guests